Why Is the EPFO Making Employers’ Lives Difficult with New Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) or Multiple-Factor Authentication (MFA)?

Why Is the EPFO Making Employers’ Lives Difficult with New Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) or Multiple-Factor Authentication (MFA)?

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. What Exactly Is the Government Thinking with This 2FA Requirement?
3. How Is the 2FA Process Complicating Employers’ Daily Operations?
4. Why is the Dependency on Mobile Networks a Huge Problem?
5. Technical Issues: What Happens When Things Go Wrong?
6. Do We Really Need 2FA When Other Security Protocols Are Already in Place?
7. Conclusion: Did the Government Really Think This Through?
8. FAQs: What Employers Need to Know About 2FA

Introduction

Is the Employees’ Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) seriously making our lives more difficult? With the introduction of two-factor authentication (2FA) for employers logging into the PF portal, it seems like the government is more focused on creating headaches than actually helping businesses. But what exactly is the point of this new process, and why are we forced to deal with it?

What Exactly Is the Government Thinking with This 2FA Requirement?

Does the government believe that adding an extra step to log in will magically solve all security issues? Or is it just another unnecessary bureaucratic measure designed to complicate the lives of employers? The intention might be to enhance security, but at what cost?

How Is the 2FA Process Complicating Employers’ Daily Operations?

Who has the time for this unnecessary hassle? Instead of a quick login, employers now have to wait for an OTP to arrive on their phone. Imagine dealing with this during busy periods when every second counts. How many operations are being delayed because someone is sitting there waiting for an OTP?

Why Is the Dependency on Mobile Networks a Huge Problem?

Are we really supposed to depend on unreliable mobile networks for something as critical as accessing the PF portal? What happens when the network is? Does the government think employers have nothing better to do than troubleshoot these issues?

Technical Issues: What Happens When Things Go Wrong?

What’s the plan when the OTP doesn’t arrive, or worse, when it expires before you can use it? Employers are left in the lurch, trying to log in repeatedly and wasting precious time. Why isn’t there a backup plan for when this flawed system inevitably fails?

Do We Really Need 2FA When Other Security Protocols Are Already in Place?

What’s the point of introducing 2FA when the EPFO portal already has multiple security layers in place? Employers are already required to go through several authentication steps, so why add yet another one that only creates more frustration? Here’s what’s already mandatory:

1. DSC and Password for Approval of Changes:

• For KYC, PAN, and banking information approvals, employers must use a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC), which itself requires a password for authorization. Isn’t this enough to ensure security?

For eg: If the employee applies for any changes, like KYC approval, or claims, etc through the EPFO portal, then the employer has to approve it with a DSC (Digital Signature) where the digital signature already has a password-protected authorization added to it which is an addition step of mandatory security protocol for avoiding fraud and additional protection.

2. E-sign and OTP for Joint Declaration Changes:

• For changes like an employee’s name, date of joining, or date of birth, the employer must upload an Esign, which requires an OTP sent to the registered mobile number. How is this not secure enough?

For eg: If the employee requests changes in name, date of joining, DOB, etc., an additional security step is added, which is to upload the E – sign, for which an OTP would be sent to the registered mobile number of the E-sign authorizer.

3. Banking Login Info (ID and Password) Required for Payment:

• When generating a Challan for payments, employers need to log in using a banking ID and password. If the banking system’s security protocols are deemed sufficient, why aren’t the EPFOs?

For eg: If a Challan is generated by an employer for a particular amount i.e.: (50 Lakhs) then it cannot be processed without an additional verification login ID and Password of the Bank.

These multiple layers of security should already be more than enough to prevent fraud and unauthorized access. Adding 2FA on top of all this feels redundant and just plain annoying. It’s not just about enhancing security; it’s about creating unnecessary hurdles. Isn’t it just a Headache?

Conclusion: Did the Government Really Think This Through?

Honestly, did anyone actually think about the practical implications of this 2FA requirement? While security is important, the current implementation is more of a burden than a benefit. It’s high time the EPFO reconsiders this decision and finds a way to balance security with usability.

Click here to download this Blog Article.

FAQs: What Employers Need to Know About 2FA

Q: What should I do if I don’t receive the OTP?

A: You’ll have to wait and try again, or contact EPFO support, which is often slow to respond.

Q: Can I disable 2FA?

A: No, the 2FA is mandatory for all employers accessing the PF portal.

Q: What happens if I’m locked out?

A: You’ll need to go through a lengthy recovery process, possibly delaying critical operations.

Q: Is there a workaround for the 2FA process?

A: No, you’re stuck with it. All employers must go through the 2FA process every time they log in.

For more information, check out our website: Service – EXERTION HR SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.